Monday, August 5, 2013

'It will be beautiful again': Breezy Point couple returns home, and recovers through rebuilding

John Makely / NBC News

Christine and George Donley, both 63, are finally moving home after nine months of being displaced by Hurricane Sandy. All of their possesions that they could save are now piled up in one room on the second floor as workers finish repairing their home.

By Miranda Leitsinger, Staff Writer, NBC News

BREEZY POINT, N.Y. -- Half of their neighbors are gone, piles of sand occupy lots where homes once stood, and they?re living out of one room of the two-story house they?ve owned for 10 years. This is one couple?s life nine months after Hurricane Sandy.

Christine and George Donley, both 63, desperately wanted to get home after Sandy tore through their quiet corner of New York City last Oct. 29. But now that they?ve finally returned, being among familiar things offers just some?comfort.

?Sixty-three years old sleeping on a mattress on the floor is tough,? Christine said as she presented the single habitable room of their Breezy Point home. ?He sleeps on the couch, and this is where we live now.

?Everyone says, ?Oh, isn?t it great? You?re back in your house.? I say no, because, look how I'm living. This isn?t living.?


?Oh, it?s pretty close to it,? countered George. Christine admitted that he was the more optimistic of the two of them.

They have a mini fridge, a TV and a shower that doesn?t stream water at full capacity. Their former bedroom, at the other end of the house and facing the Atlantic Ocean, is what George now calls a storage room: it?s filled with items salvaged from the first floor ? a comforter, clothes, little mementos from life before.

Near the window, overlooking the sea, is a white chair with a foot rest.

?This used to be my little corner to sit and read. That was my reading corner and I'd look out onto the ocean, and life was peaceful,? said Christine, a retired school teacher. ?This is, this was, our beautiful bedroom.?

George gently told her: ?It will be beautiful again.?

Nearly 74,000 homes and apartments in New York and New Jersey, where Sandy made landfall, sustained damage, according to FEMA. Some 450 homes in New York were destroyed by the storm, while approximately 46,000 in New Jersey were destroyed or sustained major damage, the agency said.

The Donleys returned home July 20 after refuging in three different locations: the homes of two relatives (including one in the early days that housed 11 adults, two kids and a baby) and a rental apartment in Brooklyn.

Apart from dealing with the inconvenience of transient existence, the Donleys have spent untold hours wrestling with their insurance company over coverage, forcing them to take money out of their retirement savings for home. (They?re still challenging the firm?s decision not to pay $12,000 for foundation damage.)

They?ve watched their two daughters struggle, too, to get back to their damaged homes, helping them where they could with money, repairs and babysitting.

?It?s a loss of a year of your life, that?s what it?s like,? said George, a CPA who is mostly retired. ?It?s the loss of being near your friends and neighbors, and it?s because they?re suffering from the same loss that you don?t have contact with them.?

More than 75 percent of the homes in close-knit Breezy Point were damaged in the storm ? including nearly 130 that burned down in a fire triggered by Sandy?s surging waters (it was the largest blaze in New York City?s modern history).

In front of the Donley?s house is an empty lot, and another large one nearby is vacant.

?Four houses there,? George said, gesturing across the street. ?They floated up like an entire team, came up, and crashed into some of the houses here. So it was one, two, three, four.?

George said that observing the rebuilding of their house has given them a lift ? new appliances are waiting to be installed and they?ve ordered furniture just like their former pieces to make the downstairs feel homey. They?ve also figured out how to carve out a new room for the grandkids ? one, a grandson, who was born a little more than a week ago.

But the Donleys are still awaiting final word ? like many others across the city and in New Jersey ? from the federal government about new building requirements for homes situated in regional flood zones.

New, preliminary federal flood maps for the region mandate that people living in vulnerable areas like the Donleys will have to elevate their homes a certain number of feet ? about four in their case ? or face steep increases in their insurance. Some homeowners will have to get new kinds of foundations, too, among other adjustments.

John Makely / NBC News

Christine and George Donley, both 63, are finally moving home after nine months of being displaced by Hurricane Sandy.

The requirements could go into effect for all homeowners in the Breezy area, though some whose homes were significantly damaged or demolished will have to do the work sooner.

?We were living in the apartment and we?re saying, well, maybe we won?t go back in until we find out how high we have to go,? Christine said. Ultimately, ?we don?t have two to three years for them to decide how high we have to go. We can?t afford to pay the rent and pay a mortgage while they?re deciding.?

Elevating is an expense that can range from tens of thousands of dollars to more than $100,000 depending on the type of residence and foundation.

Returning to the Breezy community has made dealing with all of the uncertainty bearable.

?We?re able to see and spend time with our friends and neighbors who are here and we?re sharing (our) struggling stories with them,? he said. ?It?s good to see them.?

A neighbor and good friend, Catherine Palummeri, had tidied up the Donley home and put up a big sign reading, ?welcome home,? to greet the couple upon their return. ?I couldn't wait for them to come back,? she said.

?You need people, that?s it ? let?s get back to normal,? said Palummeri, who moved back in late March. ?The worst part was having no neighbors ? you had no interaction.?

Also giving the Donleys a boost: family time on the beach.

?The water has been beautiful. The beach has been great,? George said.

As she sat in a rocking chair on her new deck, where a city building department flyer was posted listing their home?s condition and new insulation clung to the outside walls, Christine said they would make it through the storm ? one that she said she would not ?honor? by calling it by its given name.

?We will get through this,? she said. ?I am stronger than the storm. I am. It took me a long time to say that, but I said it the other night. I am stronger.?

Source: http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663306/s/2f85eb91/sc/10/l/0Lusnews0Bnbcnews0N0C0Inews0C20A130C0A80C0A30C1983830A90Eit0Ewill0Ebe0Ebeautiful0Eagain0Ebreezy0Epoint0Ecouple0Ereturns0Ehome0Eand0Erecovers0Ethrough0Erebuilding0Dlite/story01.htm

lindzi cox bachelor finale courtney robertson ben flajnik hunger games premiere red meat bachelor ben

Five Reasons Why I Love Animals More Than People | xoJane

image

Walking my dog, Henny, in my ridiculous cat shoes. (My cats are never far from mind, see.)

I've always loved animals more than I loved humans. I know, lots of people say that (a lot of people I know, anyway, but maybe that's because all the people I know are bleeding-heart lefty animal-loving types). In my case, though, I really mean it (at least most of the time).

I've been a massive animal lover since birth, basically. When I was a kid, we had a cat named Trouble, whom I enjoyed chasing, harassing, and forcing to snuggle with me; she enjoyed routinely scratching my face when she wasn't purring and being a lovebug. She lived to be 16, and soon after she died, we promptly adopted 2 kittens.

Except for my freshman year of college, I've literally never NOT had a cat. Nowadays, I've got 2 kitties (Joon, 14, and Batman, 10-ish) and a dog (Henny, 8-ish), all rescues. They are one of my primary reasons for living -- I love them so much I can hardly deal sometimes.

image

My cat children, Joon (L) and Batman (R).

My adoration for animals sometimes manifests itself in weird ways, like how I can't drive past road kill without wanting to shriek and throw myself from the vehicle. Oh, and I have to physically look away during those awful Sarah McLachlan commercials -- you know the ones. (I doubt I'm alone there; those ads are traumatic!)

Anyway, here are my five reasons why animals are better than people. Let me know if you agree with my assessments.

1. THEY'RE COVERED IN FUR!!1!

They're like living, breathing stuffed animals. How could anyone NOT go instantly mush-gush and start involuntarily emitting squeaky high-pitched noises when confronted with fuzzy critters? (I'm equal opportunity -- my strongest passion is for cats and dogs, but bunnies and gerbils and ferrets and all kinds of other small furry animals are great, too). How could anyone NOT want to take an adoptable fur-face home for their very own? There's nothing I like more than watching terrible TV like "The Bachelorette" with a purring cat sprawled across my chest. Preferably while shoveling frozen yogurt into my maw.

2. THEY CAN'T TALK.

This means they can't yell at you, or fight with you, or belittle you, or try to make you jealous, or insult your intelligence, or catcall at you (heh), or ask you for things you aren't prepared to give, or tell you how to live your life. This also means they (sadly) can't propose marriage, or thank you for dinner, or give you life advice, or ask you to change their cat litter. But who cares. Sitting in silence with an animal is awesome. And they communicate effectively with meows, barks, glances, glares, and odd body language (my personal favorite: elevator butt, when a cat shoves his ass in the air to indicate that he wants you to scratch his back).

3. THEY'RE HONEST: IT'S ALL ABOUT INSTINCT, MAN.

They have no ulterior motives. They don't plot to steal your boyfriend, or make insipid comments about your roots starting to go grey, or answer important questions with frustrated sighs. They're all heart and gut. They do what they feel, and they can tell if you're sad. When they love you, it's clear. If they aren't that into you, it's also clear. There are no guessing games with animals, no human-scale subtleties, nuances or shades of grey. Sure, there can be some mixed signals when you first meet 'em -- when they're not sure about you, when you're first starting to build a bond. But once they've learned to trust you, they tend to become wholeheartedly obsessed with you -- and they have zero interest in "playing it cool," feigning indifference, or not calling you back. They have more important things to eat.

image

Joon and Batman are making demands of me in their little heads (they just can't vocalize them, dammit). Henny the dog is just doing what canines do: hovering. Staring. Relaxing.


4. THEY MAKE US FEEL IMPORTANT.

Humans like to be needed. I'd even go so far as to say that we NEED to be needed. It makes us feel valuable, like our existence matters, like it would be a concrete loss -- to someone, or something -- if we died. Our animals need us. They rely on us for food, and shelter, and bathroom supplies, and luxuries like toys and treats. (And love, of course!) And because they can't ask for what they need, this kind of dependence feels even weightier -- not only do they need us, but we're expected to KNOW what they need without them asking or telling us. They're like babies, but ... forever! This is a real responsibility, one that obviously shouldn't be taken lightly. Thankfully, for many animal lovers, I don't think it is. Plenty of us actually enjoy feeling responsible for keeping our creatures healthy and happy. They pay us back a zillionfold with cuddles, purrs, and in helping us feel less lonely.

5. THEY LOVE US ANYWAY.

Animals give us the kind of acceptance we should be giving ourselves, but don't. They don't give a whit about our hair, or our outfit, or our adorable new platform shoes, or how bad we stink when we've somehow managed to forget to take a shower for 3 days. (Actually, who knows -- maybe they DO give a whit, but they can't verbalize it, so we'd never know! Doh.) Regardless, our pets' love for us is untainted and unconditional. They accept us whole; they don't mind kissing us when we have morning breath, and they certainly don't mind snuggling up with our sweaty gym clothes or dirty socks from the hamper (they actually kind-of like it -- ew). They're cool with whatever we do, however we look, however we feel. They're just SO INCREDIBLY OUT-OF-THIS-WORLD GLAD that we're there at all.

Did I forget anything?!

Source: http://www.xojane.com/relationships/five-reasons-i-love-animals-more-than-people

Cam Cameron Ada Lovelace 12/12/12 manny pacquiao Chopper Live jerry brown michael buble

How to Communicate Security Imperatives to the Business : The ...

pic

Imagine, due to significant cost cutting, that vulnerability management has been ignored in your company.

Now, under new leadership, vulnerability management is reassessed and recent reports have highlighted 50,000+ vulnerabilities in the IT environment.

picAs a security expert, you worry that these vulnerabilities could be exploited by an attacker and lead to a major security incident.

It?s time to bring this to the attention of management?before it?s too late.

As critical as risk is, most security experts find it challenging to convey security imperatives to executive management.

Where do you start? What will give you the edge for getting buy-in to invest in security?

Global IT executive Jitender Arora and Dwayne Melancon, Tripwire?s CTO, will demonstrate the pitfalls and offer tips and tricks for communicating security initiatives with executives and non-financial stakeholders.

In this webcast you will:

  • Learn how to start the conversation with the business (aligning to its initiatives v. NGFW)
  • Prioritize your spending based on what?s important to the business
  • Connect security controls with business initiatives (talk about SCM, VM, SIEM, etc.)
  • Continuously measure progress and tie results back to the business objectives

?

?

Dozens of previously aired webcasts covering topics like Security Configuration Management, Compliance Automation and Achieving Continuous Monitoring are available for viewing HERE.

?

Title image courtesy of ShutterStock


Tags: budgets, Communicating, Connecting Security to the Business, Enterprise Risk Management, Enterprise Security, Jitender Arora, Security Controls, Security Metrics, Vulnerability Management, webcast

Categories: Connecting Security to the Business


This post was written by?

Kate Carson has contributed 12 posts to The State of Security.

Contact Kate Carson

Kate loves Tripwire? she gets to play Marketing Coordinator there! Her desire is to bring fun to the workplace, work as a team toward a common goal, and to foster the unique culture at Tripwire. In her spare time she likes to run, spend time with the fam, and dress like a giant pencil. Whatta life!

Source: http://www.tripwire.com/state-of-security/it-security-data-protection/connecting-security-to-the-business/how-to-communicate-security-imperatives-to-the-business/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-to-communicate-security-imperatives-to-the-business

Cnn Electoral Map roseanne barr guy fawkes gary johnson gary johnson where do i vote dixville notch

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

The Old Reader goes all the way in emulating Google Reader – it’s closing

Google?s announcement in March that it was to close its Reader service a few months later sent most users of the service scurrying off to find a replacement. Various companies spruced up their existing RSS reader offering while others built a new one from scratch in an effort to sweep up news addicts looking for a new home for their beloved feeds.

While Feedly proved a popular choice for many, Digg?s reader also gained a lot of praise for its clean, simple design, and picked up a lot of former Reader users as a result.

For those hoping for an experience as close to possible to Google?s Reader tool, the aptly named The Old Reader was a no brainer. It looked like Reader and acted like Reader. In fact, it?s turned out to be a bit too much like Reader ? it?s closing down next month.

Well, to be specific, it?s closing its public site. This means that if you switched to it after the news broke that Google?s Reader was shuttering, you?ll no longer be able to use The Old Reader from the middle of August.

?No work-life balance?

Developers Elena Bulygina and Dmitry Krasnoukhov explained the decision in a lengthy piece posted Monday. Essentially, the pair became overwhelmed by the extra amount of work involved in keeping the site going following the sudden influx of new users in the last couple of months. The first sign that all was not well came last week when The Old Reader crashed and remained offline for days.

?In March things became ?nightmare?, but we kept working hard and got things done,? the pair wrote in the post. ?First, we were out of evenings, then out of weekends and holidays, and then The Old Reader was the only thing left besides our jobs. Last week difficulty level was changed to ?hell? in every possible aspect we could imagine, we have been sleep deprived for 10 days and this impacts us way too much.

?The truth is, during last 5 months we have had no work-life balance at all.?

Private site

User registration has been closed and the site will be kept running for a select few, including friends, backers, and those who signed up before March 13, the date Google announced it was shuttering Reader.

If you don?t fall into one of these categories, you have two weeks to export your OPML file (click on your name top right of the The Old Reader interface, then on Settings, then scroll down and look for the export your feeds link), which you can take to Feedly, Digg, or another RSS reader.

Bulygina and Krasnoukhov do offer fans of The Old Reader some hope, explaining in their post that they?re ready to listen to anyone interested in acquiring the site. But if no takeover happens, it?s curtains for most users.

?We?d rather provide a smooth and awesome experience for 10,000 users than a crappy one for 420,000,? the developers wrote, adding, ?Sorry, each and everyone if we failed you. You are an incredible, supportive and helpful community. The best we could possibly hope for.?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/digitaltrends/~3/_QiZWM1v35I/

Dorothy Hamill hard boiled eggs Red Equal Sign maundy thursday Mexico vs USA Harmony Korine Summly

Passengers kicked off 'heavy' London City Airport flights

She said Swiss had ?faced similar situations in the past? due to adverse winds but ?only at London City? airport.

One passenger on board Sunday?s affected flight claimed bags were also removed from the plane, but Swiss denied this. ?We were told the plane was overweight by a tonne,? she said. ?A ground handler said it's happening every day from London City because in bad weather the pilots need a lot of fuel, and can't take off from City with a lot of fuel and a full plane of passengers. So every day passengers and baggage are being offloaded.?

A spokesman for CityJet, which flies from the airport to destinations including Edinburgh, Paris, Milan, Florence, Amsterdam and Dublin, said the problem ? which affects the airline's 15 Fokker 50 aircraft, but not its 23 Avro RJ85s ? occurs on a ?weekly or monthly, but not daily? basis. He added that the airline had taken a number of steps to reduce the weight of its planes ? including installing lighter seating ? and said that when such a situation arises, economy passengers are offloaded in favour of premium ones. A British Airways spokesman said it was ?an extremely rare occurrence that we would have to remove customers from a flight due to operating restrictions at the airport.?

A spokesman for London City Airport said its location meant that an extension to the runway ?would never happen?.

Passengers denied boarding in such instances must be offered a choice of a full refund or an alternative flight. If they choose to take the next available flight, they are entitled to assistance while they wait ? including food, drink and accommodation where necessary. They are also entitled to cash compensation (see below).

The Civil Aviation Authority said: ?Airlines are responsible for operating aircraft within the manufacturer?s stated restrictions. This includes maximum take-off and landing weights, but operators must also consider other variables such as the length of the runway, any obstacles that must be cleared during the initial climb-out phase, wind speed and direction, elevation, and the outside air temperature.?

What if I am "bumped" off my flight?

As last week's Swiss flight demonstrates, weather issues will sometimes force airlines to deny passengers boarding. Furthermore, some airlines ? though not normally the no-frills airlines ? will overbook peak-time flights because their computer models tell them that a certain number of passengers will not show up. But computers sometimes get it wrong. If more passengers turn up than there are seats available, some have to be "bumped off".

If this happens to you, you are entitled to significant compensation under EU rules (which apply to the same countries' airlines and airports as specified above).

The compensation varies between ?125 and ?600 depending on the length of the delay to your final destination and the distance of the flight.

An airline is allowed to negotiate a lower rate with passengers who volunteer to be removed, but in all cases, in addition to compensation, you are entitled to "a refund within seven days of the full price you paid for your ticket" or "a return flight to the departure airport as soon as possible... or re-routing to your final destination as soon as possible or, if you agree, at a later date".

The airline must also pay for reasonable incidental expenses such as meals and hotel accommodation.

See caa.co.uk/passengers for more information.

Source: http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/633316/s/2f605918/sc/10/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Ctravel0Ctravelnews0C10A2131790CPassengers0Ekicked0Eoff0Eheavy0ELondon0ECity0EAirport0Eflights0Bhtml/story01.htm

ludwig mies van der rohe jamie lynn sigler mega millions jackpot black panther party frank martin pink slime eagle cam

Wisconsin sues Florida company alleging no-call violations

The state is suing a Florida-based company that sells magazine subscription renewals for violating Wisconsin's no-call policy.

The complaint was filed Monday against Publishers Marketing Service and alleges the company has made numerous calls to Wisconsin residents without registering as a telephone solicitor and has called numbers listed on the state's no-call registry, according to a state attorney general news release.

In addition, the lawsuit claims that the Florida company made misrepresentations to sell magazine subscriptions, such as lying to customers about planned subscription price increases to panic them into renewing.

The case has been assigned to Dane County Circuit Court Judge Amy Smith. The state is represented by Assistant Attorney General Lewis W. Beilin.

? 2013, Journal Sentinel Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/wisconsin-sues-florida-company-alleging-no-call-violations-b9965023z1-217607631.html

san francisco 49ers san francisco 49ers stan musial Mega 49ers lance armstrong Earl Weaver

Man Recreates Donkey Kong Video Game Using Stop Motion: What Have You Done Today?

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/07/man-recreates-donkey-kong-video-game-using-stop-motion-what-have/

Rebecca Soni Snoop Lion London 2012 Table Tennis badminton Dominique Dawes Gabby Olympic Gymnast Robyn Lawley